Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Ummat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 23:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Daily Ummat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

News Blog is not notable hence the Wikipedia page should be deleted, i don't understand how this page is still active? not passing WP:GNG Memon KutianaWala (talk) 12:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.Memon KutianaWala (talk) 12:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.Memon KutianaWala (talk) 12:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Couldn't find any independent sourcing for verification.Citing (talk) 22:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep the subject seems notable to me per, , , , , and . TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi @TheBirdsShedTears Mentioning the paper doesn't mean that the paper is notable itself, there are many news website and newspaper are mentioned by the CNN, BBC, Nytimes but they don't have Wikipedia page here. I would like to mention that Daily Ummat Newspaper is not close to taliban, the paper itself was faced charges in Pakistan for airing fake news in past and as of now they are not getting paid by the governments due to their fake claims. see example this blog a Wikipedia page is approved since long, no reference and nothing but it is accepted anyhow by editors and there are many pages available on Wikipedia which is accepted by editors but the article itself isn't notable. The Teenager (Pakistan)

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 09:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment We are discussing here whether the subject should be "kept" or "deleted". Second, if the newspaper has been charged for fake news, one can update the article accordingly, but this does not mean the subject in question fails to meet notability guidelines. As far as i know, it has not been fully updated with reliable sources since 2005. I am also happy with "delete". TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - the article is already well-sourced. Störm   (talk)  00:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,    Kadzi    (talk) 11:49, 31 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.