Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daimonin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Daimonin
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No real assertion of notability outside the project's existence, no significant coverage from independent third party reliable sources. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Doesn't seem to have acquired any reliable sources since its previous deletion in 2007, just the same old entries on WP:RS-failing anyone-can-submit-an-entry directory sites. If the games press haven't reviewed or written about it since 2007, it still doesn't merit a Wikipedia article. --McGeddon (talk) 16:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - no improvement since the previous AfD. References: Wikipedia can't cite Wikipeia as a source. None of the remaining sources are at all reliable. External links: The "shotgun" approach to indiscriminate linking, I see. Despite purporting to be reviews, these are no such thing, being merely directory entries on sites we would not link to anyway. These are all unnacceptable WP:SPSs. Marasmusine (talk) 12:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete – per the above. Should have been speedy deleted per G4. –MuZemike 00:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.