Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy "Daisie" Presley

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 15:54, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

Daisy "Daisie" Presley
Pets of semi-famous people encyclopaedic? "Spoilers"??? Feydey 23:15, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. BJAODN. I find nothing to suggest it is factual.  Also, note corresponding category (Category:Historical_dogs) was created, with this as the sole child. --Tabor 23:52, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Chuckle, BJODN Silly little piece. The alleged picture of Daisy is actually used on many other serious dog pages. Why would "Daisie" be a nickname for "Daisy" anyway? I doubt its skeleton was in any national museum. Having it birth and death categories is beyond absurd. ...everyone remembered her being in heaven with Jesus. Had the dog previously been in heaven with Jesus before it died? --BDD 00:17, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Also it is misleading, THAT picture is not of THIS dog. (ah, the good old Edit conflict... great minds think alike!) Master Thief Garrett 00:33, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this bitch! &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 01:45, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Change of heart: transwiki to the Encyclopaedia BJAODNonica.  &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 18:39, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Send this article to heaven with Jesus. Gamaliel 02:53, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spoiler warning indeed. Shiri &mdash; Talk 04:20, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apparently a joke. Sietse 18:33, 7 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.