Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy Tanwani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 21:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Daisy Tanwani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for non notable entrepreneur, written by SPA. The first two references are self-serving interviews where she says what she pleases about herself and her company. The third is basically a copy of them, and essentially a press release. Not a single one is independent, and considering the fundamental lack of having done anything notable, there is not likely to be anything better.  DGG ( talk ) 15:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment. Could potentially be COI. I want to bring up Shilpa Sharma, which is edited by this user along with this and this account as SPA. I suspect sock puppetry. THE NEW  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 16:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete this advertisement. Trillfendi (talk) 19:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete All sources that I could find are social media links, and others, as mentioned by the nominator are self-seeking interviews, clearly fails WP:GNG. Business leaders of non-notable companies are not notable, unless they have importance in some other field, WP:BUSINESSPERSONOUTCOME. In this case, "Pinklay Retail Private Limited" is definitely not-notable. It is just another home goods store. KCVelaga (talk) 04:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as PR cruft: lacks the most basic coverage in reliable sources required to pass WP:ANYBIO. ——  SerialNumber  54129  18:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete violates WP:PROMO. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete reference not stong and Source not for enough keep this articlel. advertisement, promoted, violence.Swe123123 (talk) 10:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:PROMO piece. Lapablo (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.