Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daitec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge and redirect to Daiko Group per later discussion. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Daitec
nn companies. BBtec 02:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The article makes little claim of notability, and I couldn't find anything on Google that would help it pas WP:CORP. -- Kicking222 11:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete shameless spam on obscure company --Mecanismo | Talk 16:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Undecided, Daitec as a small division may not deserve an article. However, Daiko, the parent company, does not appear to have an article. Daiko is a multinational, multifunctional Japanese company. Nuttah68 20:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect into Daiko Group, the parent company. There's enough information for a decent section, but not an entire article. Daitec's site says they bring in ¥55 million annually (about $470,145USD as of today), so they really aren't that huge of a company. Not small, either, but not huge. They do appear to be the largest of the subsidiary groups, though. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  01:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete.NN.-Kmaguir1 06:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please until article for daiko group can be created the companies are important by wikipedia standard Yuckfoo 00:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete .Move to Daiko Group and edit a little to make a stub. Alone it is not notable enough. Mukadderat 17:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I create the Daiko Group page, and added the info from the Daitec page. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  18:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Mwerge per Nihonjoe. Ya ya ya ya ya ya 00:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Daiko Group. Zaxem 05:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.