Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daivajanam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   D e lete. Tiptoety talk 06:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Daivajanam

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BK. Article written by an editor with the same name as the book's author last name. VG &#x260E; 20:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC) Delete - Non notable book. Springnuts (talk) 20:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom cf38  talk  21:16, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Delete - non-notable and part of a walled garden of material that *seems* to be pushed by the subject of the article as discussed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_checkuser#Possible_socks_around_Kuzhinapurath-related_articles. here]--Cameron Scott (talk) 23:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - tear down that walled garden. All the sources originate from the author of the article (who is also the name of the book), or associated with him. Definitely promotional in nature. B.Wind (talk) 04:22, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.