Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dakshin Khayer Bari High School (X)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dhupguri. Spartaz Humbug! 15:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Dakshin Khayer Bari High School (X)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non-notable high school with zero coverage in reliable sources. This could have been an A1 or A7, but schools aren't usually eligible for CSD, so AfD it is. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:26, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Move to "Dakshin Khayer Bari High School" as Draft, redirect to Dhupguri where the article was spun off. No sources presented. X is not a proper disambiguator. It was mainly so that it indicates it starts at the equivalent of 10th grade, or perhaps that it is a regular X school and not a 10+2? Hard to tell. But it's not part of the school's name. So (X) should be removed.   AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:55, 26 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Current practice: WP:NSCHOOL which says "All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must satisfy either this guideline (WP:ORG) or the general notability guideline, or both. For profit educational organizations and institutions are considered Commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria. (See also WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, especially for universities.)" WP:ORGCRIT: "if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."  Only source presented: Integrated Management Information System (IMIS)      Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation: Significant coverage: No  (just a listing of the school),  Independent: Yes (government), Reliable: Yes (government), Secondary: Yes (government), Pass: 0 (Fail, can't count toward ORGCRIT).  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 03:31, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Needs renaming but here's an Indian government source verifying the "sr. secondary" school's existence and location (entry 64). Again (1, 2), took me a matter of minutes to find. Please all, let's heed WP:BEFORE. Innisfree987 (talk) 20:18, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * This has the same problem as the other nom. The source is but an entry in the government list, so that's a reason to redirect it to the related list. It is not significant coverage of the school. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:16, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete Okay, there is proof that the school actually exists. But conform the RFC on Schooloutcomes that is not enough any more. There must be proof that the school is notable. The Banner talk 12:01, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - The source indicated by Innisfree987 shows it's a verified secondary school. Having to flesh out he notability of every secondary school in the world is a bad path for WP to go down.--Oakshade (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 17:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong delete – The fact that it can be shown to exist doesn't make it notable in and of itself, it needs significant coverage from multiple independent reliable secondary sources. That is blatantly not the case.--Newbiepedian (talk · contribs · X! · logs) 05:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dhupguri.Exists but no coverage in sources. ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:33, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Move to draft and redirect, per AngusWOOF's argument. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:17, 16 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.