Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dal LaMagna (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:10, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Dal LaMagna
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The page already went through an AfD discussion and it was determined that the page need be deleted yet the page was never deleted. Snood1205 (talk) 05:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Alright folks, this afd originates form the recreated page which is essentially a reborn version of the previously deleted copy, however there are a few changes to it and the article as such is not a strict, word-for-word recreation of previous material. That makes both the afd and csd templates plausible for the article. I've fixed this page, and will let the afd run until the article completes its run through here or ends up deleted on csd grounds, which ever happens first. TomStar81 (Talk) 04:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 20:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:16, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find anything here that supports notability. I think that the opening of the article rather sums it up: here's a guy. In the article you find that he started a business, made some money, wrote a book (a memoir, of all things, with two ghostish-writers). Then he runs for office (on his own money) and loses. It's made worse by the promotional tone of most of the article. Please let's get rid of this one. LaMona (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.