Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Partridge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 13:43, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Dale Partridge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Piece has strongly promotional tone, despite having cleaned out the large number of inappropriate external links. Additionally, the focus of the supplied sources appears to be Partridge's business Sevenly rather than Partridge himself. Given that, the notability of the article's subject appears, in my eyes, to be distinctly borderline and worth consulting the community about. Dolescum (talk) 03:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete. The focus is indeed far more on Sevenly  than on  Partridge. The sources are about  the success story  of the store and most  of them are about  Apple or other companies and based mainly  on  interviews. A promotional  piece masquerding  as a bio. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of material and lack of importance.  DGG ( talk ) 16:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.