Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Roberts (footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 23:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Dale Roberts (footballer)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Football player fails WP:ATHLETE as he has not played at a fully-professional level. Also fails WP:GNG due to no significant third party coverage on his exploits as a player. --Jimbo[online] 20:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agreed; the Conference isn't fully professional and he apparently never made a full appearance at Forest. Gonzonoir (talk) 20:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails both WP:ATH and WP:GNG Steve-Ho (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 21:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 21:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This would be analogous to a "rookie league" player in organized baseball, not even single-A. Mandsford (talk) 21:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Once he goes pro and makes the field, we can have an article. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:30, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. GauchoDude (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom Spiderone  13:26, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable player, fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. --Carioca (talk) 23:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - is this grounds for WP:SNOW yet? --71.227.178.136 (talk) 22:36, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Nom. I don't think it's a total snowball effect as he is only 22 and still has plenty of time to make it back up the league ladder!! Govvy (talk) 00:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.