Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalitstan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 02:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Dalitstan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is mainly the work of the banned User:Hkelkar and a now-blocked Primetime sock, user:Cardreader. The subject is a wesite which has been taken down. The article is largely self-referential. Guy (Help!) 21:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Notice board for India-related topics notified. Pavel Vozenilek 22:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep article is cited and referenced.--D-Boy 22:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - it was banned by the indian government, it is inherently notable. 1 billion people were denied access to this site (though i commend the indian government). Baka man  01:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.
 * Keep This website was banned by the government of India. It was widely discussed and quoted by scholars in Indology.--ISKapoor 03:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above.  — N o b l e e a g l e  [TALK]  [C] 06:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The website has enough notability to stay. GizzaChat  &#169; 11:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Wikipedia has been banned from time to time in different parts of the world. I think that that will not be a ground for deleting the entire Wikipedia from the earth, and this applies to the site under reference. Moreover, an article's encyclopedic values should be examined and not the credentials of editors concerned who created the major contents. We do not have a system to remove all the contents added by a banned user. --Bhadani 17:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable organization. Tag the article if it's not neutral. utcursch | talk 14:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.