Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalkeith High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep. — BradV 19:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Dalkeith High School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is not notable and is a target of frequent vandalism. — BradV 00:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep it has been the subject of multiple instances of non-trivial coverage in national-level media as a result of the religious problems there. cab (talk) 02:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   cab (talk) 02:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.   cab (talk) 02:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable per refs added by Cab. Sting au  Buzz Me...   04:44, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep above and beyond the broadly accepted precedent of WP:Inherent notability for high schools, the sources provided in the article satisfy the Notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 07:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sting au. Also, the solution for vandalism is vigilance, not deletion. • Gene93k (talk) 08:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Alansohn. Ben MacDuiTalk /  Walk  08:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: This article has been significantly improved since I nominated it for deletion (Thanks cab). If there are no objections the discussion can be closed and the notice deleted. — BradV 16:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is quite a poor nomination I'm afraid, many articles on Wikipedia are much greater targets of vandalism and that is never a reason for deletion, its simply the nature of an open editing system.  RFerreira (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please note that there was no reference to anything notable in the article when I nominated it. See a snapshot here. — BradV 18:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep per comment from nominator. -- DS1953 talk 18:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.