Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dallas Barnett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 00:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Dallas Barnett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as non-notable ACTOR. Quis separabit? 22:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as there is some modest filmography on him, article just needs more expansion and sources Programming G E E K (mah page! // use words to communicate page) 22:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:40, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:40, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete at best as unless there are some considerably better improvements, none of this is satisfying WP:ENTERTAINER. SwisterTwister   talk  06:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Has appeared in notable productions, but I would argue not in significant roles, so does not meet WP:NACTOR. ProgrammingGeek is correct that it needs more sources (it cites none), but searches of the usual Google types, Highbeam, and EBSCO found nothing more than cast lists, membership in a high school performace center's hall of fame, and a middle earth fan site interview. This is not the "written about, in depth, independently in multiple magazine feature articles, by magazine article writers" called for in WP:ANYBIO. Nor is it the significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources needed to meet WP:BASIC. He may become notable as his career progresses, but is not a suitable topic for a stand alone encyclopedia article at this time. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.