Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalton Thrower (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:44, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Dalton Thrower
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:GNG per only WP:ROUTINE coverage (most of the sources listed before seem to either be less independent or not very significant in depth of coverage). Fails WP:NHOCKEY by not playing in a high enough league for long enough, no awards, and not drafted high enough. Yosemiter (talk) 02:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable hockey player who only got routine coverage. Hockey players either have to meet the notability for hockey players, or pass GNG in a way not related to hockey, neither is passed here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:59, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY. Papaursa (talk) 18:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.