Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalton Williams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Dalton Williams

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Undistinguished American football player and coach. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:10, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm unable to locate an actual professional football career and haven't been able to unearth any coverage from his college play or any other articles that would surpass WP:GNG. Cannot find a measure where the subject would pass notability.  Would change my mind if it were presented, others might have better research--but based on the article contents and what I can find in my own searches there's nothing of any impact.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete There isn't enough notability on this guy, which is a violation of notibility guidelines. Most of what I saw has been stated well by Paul. James-the-Charizard (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. He was the starting QB of the 2012 Akron Zips football team, a Mid-American Conference team that went 0–8 in MAC play and finished in last place. While he received some borderline significant coverage in the Akron Beacon Journal (e.g., here and here/here), even these articles are not focused on Williams. Not finding the type of significant coverage in multiple, reliable, and independent sources needed to push him over the GNG hurdle. Cbl62 (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.