Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dam (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Dam (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evident notability/SIGCOV. Searches bring up a much more wide variety of results; sources presented in article do not demonstrate notability.  Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 18:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music,  and England.  Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 18:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - Nominator rationale is sound. Sources in article are severly insufficient and searching is a nightmare due to term commonality. Even if we use "Dãm" band -wikipedia as was used at this source only 3 results come up, none of which are eligible for any notability establishing criteria. — Sirdog (talk) 06:35, 14 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.