Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DameWare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

DameWare

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  17:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep —Ruud 20:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Why should it be kept? Chris the Paleontologist  (talk • contribs) 15:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Because, unlike most other nominations AQ recently made, I've heard of this company. I don't particularly feel like digging up citations at the moment, though. —Ruud 23:33, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  04:03, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 01:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Advertisement for another enterprise system management application. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - poorly sourced (pr site, developer's site) Advertisement page created by now blocked SPA. Dialectric (talk) 23:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: though this article has multiple issues, lack of sources is enough for deletion. P.S.: I also heard of this software before. Not sure it's enough to keep it. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:31, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sometimes I think Wikipedia editors are too strict on "the rules" and don't consider whether an article is useful, i.e. makes the world a better place. I was trying to learn if DameWare is malicious software or legitimate. This article helped. A MetaCrawler search on "DameWare" returns this article as the only link on the first page that does NOT go to dameware.com. 129.219.155.89 (talk) 17:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.