Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damibliz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Damibliz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject of the article does not meet GNG or MUSICBIO. The awards listed are not notable. The author of the article may have a conflict of interest with the subject seeing as the infobox image is listed as 'own work'. The Sokks💕 (talk) 07:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  The Sokks💕 (talk) 07:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  The Sokks💕 (talk) 07:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  The Sokks💕 (talk) 07:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  The Sokks💕 (talk) 07:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, he’s not notable at all. Also I believe the awards were just made up by the author. Fails WP:MUSICBIO -Xclusivzik (talk) 09:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Lots of streams on Spotify. He has fans. Quite a new artist.   scope_creep Talk  19:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Question Hey, I want to clarify something about your !vote per a conversation I had here. It was stated that having a large fanbase/cult following is especially useless in determining notability, especially for Nigerians. What are your thoughts? Also, do number of streams and having fans contribute towards MUSICBIO? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSokks (talk • contribs) 2021-04-29T23:35:57 (UTC)
 * Comment — @, please start by learning how to sign after each entry you make. See WP:SIGN. Now, it is your prerogative to challenge a rationale for a keep or delete !vote but what you may not do is be POINTy about it. The question you asked @ was a subtle attempt to be POINTy which constitutes disruptive editing and is a quintessential example of arguments to avoid in an AFD. See WP:ATA. So please do not do such next time. Celestina007 (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable Dexxtrall (talk) 16:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment A note for the closing admin - I want to point out that per my rationale, there may be undisclosed COI/paid editing going on here because at the time of nomination, the infobox image was listed as 'own work' credited to the author. It was conveniently changed to this after this AfD was opened. The image was coincidentally uploaded to Flickr on same day it was uploaded to commons. AGF but this was a suspicious move. The editor that voted keep has also not substantiated on their keep vote as number of Spotify streams and having 'fans' do not contribute to MUSICBIO and no RS point to any of the criteria in MUSICBIO. The GNG is also not met. The Sokks💕 (talk) 03:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.