Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damien Frost


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Punkmorten 12:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Damien Frost
I removed the prod tag because I feel that, at the very least, the subject is sufficiently notable that he may meet the threshold. I have doubts about its deletion and feel that this should be brought to the community for discussion. He's been exhibited in high-profile galleries and the like. I'm currently leaning towards keep, as it's a fairly well-written article and I feel it should be given the benefit of the doubt. Captainktainer * Talk 18:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent references to assert notability, although I might be swayed by the exhibitions if references are provided. A lot of people can be featured in those sort of galleries.  The JPS talk to me  18:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual art-related deletions.   -- Captainktainer * Talk 13:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Longhair 01:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Abstain - the article doesn't really establish notability, but it is well written and sourced, and there isn't to much for non-notability either.--ZayZayEM 10:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - a close call but nothing that I can get a grip on for notability. No awards, quality independent reviews or particularly major exhibitions. BlueValour 03:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, as mentioned above, a borderline case. The article can always be recreated later if M. Frost attains more notability, however.  Lankiveil 07:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.