Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damien Mizdow and The Miz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  23:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Damien Mizdow and The Miz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Each subject of this article, Damien Mizdow and The Miz, are independently notable and have existing articles. There is no logical purpose for an additional article with them combined. Additionally the article creator appears to have an inherent WP:COI. Drm310 (talk) 19:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  21:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  21:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  21:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  21:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I'm notorious for arguing that recently created tag team articles should be deleted but his is a rare instance where I can see the purpose of this article existing as their gimmick is unique (unlike two randomly paired up guys like R-Truth and Kofi Kingston) and they have held the WWE Tag Team Championship (unlike 3MB and The Rhodes Scholars). I think that they barely meet WP:ENT. The article, as it currently exists, is an absolute catastrophe, and is in need of serious clean-up as it seems the article creator just pasted various bits from each main bio.  An article focusing on just the tag team itself might work though.LM2000 (talk) 01:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I also want to note that the main contributor in question is likely a WP:REALNAME vio and not a WP:COI issue.LM2000 (talk) 01:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I can clean up this article and improve it. So hold on! Ikhtiar H (talk) 08:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * , well, I had fixed it! 09:51, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * It's much better anyway. Should your comments be interpreted to mean that you're voting keep in this AfD though?  Also, you cannot move a page while it's being considered for deletion.  If its WP:COMMONNAME is different than the current title then we can work on that later on if this survives AfD.LM2000 (talk) 12:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep. Former tag team champions and notable team. Meets WP:N per various WP:RS within wrestling and even beyond. Phieuxghazzieh (talk) 06:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  08:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with . Ikhtiar H (talk) 09:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.