Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damien Sojoyner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:08, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Damien Sojoyner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Aacdemic of insufficient notability; appears to fulfill none of the requirements at WP:NACADEMIC (seminal work, position, or honours). -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 14:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 14:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment I turned up three academic reviews of his book . That's a step on the way to passing WP:AUTHOR, but he only has the one book . "Multiple reviews of multiple books each" seems to be the bar to clear in practice with that criterion. At the moment, I'm inclined to say that this article is just too soon. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think WP:AUTHOR requires multiple books published, as long as the book received significant attention in reviews, it should be fine. Hzh (talk) 08:46, 25 June 2018 (UTC


 * Delete As per nomination, subject doesn't meet WP:PROF. As for WP:AUTHOR, multiple works are not required, but I don't know that this book counts as "a significant or well-known work" as described in the requirement. I agree with the above-mentioned WP:TOOSOON.
 * Delete. Assistant Professors are almost lneverconsidered notable here,He cannot be shown to be a asignificant influence on his profession,as he has written only one book, though fairly well received --240 worldcat libraries. AUTHOR can be met by one book, but only if it is extremely sucessful, such as best seller lists or major prizes, or the basis for a notable film. None of these is the case here.   DGG ( talk ) 23:35, 1 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.