Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damion Lowe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Randykitty (talk) 15:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Damion Lowe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - still fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. – Michael (talk) 21:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:27, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - He hasn't played in a Fully professional league and he doesn't have any senior international caps either therefore he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. IJA (talk) 10:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - After reviewing the comments by other editors here on this AfD, I'm going to say this article just scrapes the standards of WP:GNG due to significant media coverage. IJA (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:GNG with, , , , and . Nfitz (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep – meets GNG with the reasonable and detailed sources provided by Nfitz. C679 13:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:BASIC per, , , . NorthAmerica1000 11:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The above sources demonstrate notability via BASIC. --j⚛e deckertalk 01:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep notability requirements have been met. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.