Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damita Jo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Damita Jo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:TWODABS. Damita Jo DeBlanc is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, so the page is not needed to be a DAB page. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 22:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose, how do you figure the Damita Jo DeBlanc is the primary topic? Looking at pageviews, there is no contest, in the last 90 days, the album has 12330 vs. 1745 for the person. Results for Google and Google Books are a little more mixed. Without any further evidence, I'm inclined to leave the disambiguation page where it is. older ≠ wiser 02:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep 3 valid entries. This is not the forum to discuss whether there is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, I would suggest WP:RM. Boleyn (talk) 16:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: valid dab page, discuss page move elsewhere. Pam  D  19:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Seeing as how there's multiple articles that it easily points to, it is a valid DAB page. I don't see a compelling reason to remove, or move for that matter. Shadowjams (talk) 13:53, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.