Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan (South Park character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Dan (South Park character)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

An upcoming character who the article author says Comedy Central has decided to create. I suggest we delete the article per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and Verifiability. GTBacchus(talk) 21:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: See also New Student: Dan, which I guess I should add to this nomination. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * This article is clearly false as Comedy Central would not be responsible for any edits to South Park. This user is simply using the claim to justify his edits. Another example can be found here: [] Tweeks Coffee 21:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, no proof it is real. Comedy Central does own South Park (the same way FOX owns The Simpsons), but they do not create characters or anything like that. TJ Spyke 23:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just like Abusive Aussie Husband/Battered Southern Wife stereotype.ibeatmywife LULZZZZ 03:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube 23:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Ditto. Tozoku 16:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It's quite obviously a hoax - the guy refuses to give up any sources for his information, just saying "alright, don't believe me, but it's true". If you read the other sections of his talk page it's obvious that he's also been an unreliable source in other situations. Shivers   talk  17:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Clear cut case of "not a crystal ball". --Deskana (ya rly)  17:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources, no nothing - if he actually exists, the article can be recreated. --Fredrick day 18:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources, this is nonsense. Everyoneandeveryone 20:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't delete I, as the creator of the article am sorry, but why delete something true? And besides, I meant South Park studios, and me, Trey and Matt are currently working on the character, and working on changing Kyle's colours. Don't delte, there we go, explaination given. FictionH 00:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * And explanation that made no reference to policies, and as such will be ignored by any closing administrator. --Deskana (ya rly)  00:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, why would I create a hoax? I think you could trust a 37-year old, don't you think? FictionH 00:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * (A) The world, (and history) is full of untrustworthy 37-year olds; (B) This is the Internet, and we can't tell how old you are, or anything about you, so why should we take your word for it? You could be 87 years old, or 12.  Requiring that content be verifiable in reliable sources solves all of these problems, because then it doesn't matter who you are, just that the content can be double-checked by others. -GTBacchus(talk) 01:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A) Episodes are rarely planned out more than a week before it would air. This would include the introduction of any new characters or plot lines.  B)  Comedy Central, which you say you work for, has no creative input in South Park.  CC does not see the episode until it is delivered to their office, generally early Wednesday morning.  C)  Regardless, this is not verifiable as well as speculative, so it should be removed. Tweeks Coffee 12:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You lousy son-of-a-Bitch,I am a close personal friend of Matt Stones and I have heard absolutely nothing about this.This imformation is very obviously false,first,you dont say WHERE you found this out,what episode,why Trey and Matt planned this,WHAT exactly is your function with South Park,or if this is even true,plus this "episodes" plot sounds remarkably similar to Hooked on Monkey Phonics and All about Mormons this type of episode isn't even South Park's style,maybe it was back in the pre-2000's Era but not now,plus even if it is true,there is no way you could have known such intricate details about such things as the dialogue,you even called Garrisson "Mr." and I had to change it to "Mrs.". and by the way,I do not know Stone I just claimed I did to teach you that Wikipedia is a web-option where any jackoff with a computer can post any crap they want,hell,this doesn't even fall under Wiki's non-crystal ball category,even that guy who said the Season Premiere last year would be about John Mark Karr had more sources than you did Ms.Fiction H. By the way this whole arcticle sounds too fan-fictiony to me,even your name implies you're a fan-fic writer,I wrote a fan-fic for school where the boys become the Fantastic Four,and since it was 2005 when I wrote it,I could have assumed T and P would do a parody episode,and posted a picture of Cartman as the Thing and said it would be an upcoming character,but did I? NO. besides Wikipedia hasn't announced new characters or changes or death ahead of time before,so why now? Im destroying your article right now and if you say thats web-vandalism then you're a hypocrite considering what you just pulled. Hail to the Jews!!!!. Malkulan God '07. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.72.98.117 (talk) 22:19, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete as soon as possible. --Boraphyll 04:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Im not sure, if your telling the truth about the whole South Park studios thing thats fair enough, but if your not and the whole thing is false and your lying, Im deffinetely for deletion--81.132.196.146 15:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)P.Skiddy
 * He wasn't familiar with South Park Studios until I mentioned it in one of my responses. He claims that he works for Comedy Central.  Which brings up another question:  He's said that where he lives, Kyle's colors are different (He's changed his story on this).  If he does work for Comedy Central, then wouldn't he be living in the US where Comedy Central is located?  Besides, I've seen episodes that air in other countries and the only difference is that the voices are dubbed.
 * I meant South Park studios, not Comedy Central. FictionH 17:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * So you mixed up where you work?Tweeks Coffee 17:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry about that. FictionH 18:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you realize how laughable that excuse is? If you actually worked at either one, there is no way you'd confuse the two.  Comedy Central and South Park Studios are two entirely separate entities.  They aren't even physically located near each other, either way it places you in California, where I know for a fact that Kyle's colors are not what you claimed they were where you lived. Tweeks Coffee 18:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, maybe you should consider that I have a bad memory? FictionH 20:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Would you care to counter any of my other points? Tweeks Coffee 20:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, no sources provided, notability not asserted. -Seinfreak37 18:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's been 5 days now, I'd definitely say that the NOs have it. Can we please delete this page now? Tweeks Coffee 20:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fine, if you want to delete it, I'm okay with it. FictionH 21:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.