Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Barreiro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure), per unanimity of comments after initial listing and upgrading to Heymann standard. Skomorokh 02:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Dan Barreiro

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

article fails to establish notability with reliable references Rtphokie (talk) 18:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:N.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, I feel that he is notable with all the references. Callelinea (talk) 03:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I just recently added these references. He was a sports columnist for the Star Tribune for 17 years, and has been selected "Best Sports Talk Show Host" by City Pages (a local weekly) a few times. He's gotten plenty of press. This is now the third radio host up for deletion for which I have found plenty of sources. I implore the nominator to please read AFD and to do a good-faith search for sources, as suggested in the prod-nn template, before nominating more radio hosts for deletion. DHowell (talk) 03:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Singu  larity  00:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - plenty of references and award winning radio host and long time columnist in a major market. matt91486 (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources added earlier in the AfD demonstrate notability.  The nominator should probably have another look at the article.  Celarnor Talk to me  01:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep With added refs meets notabilty and RS. ukexpat (talk) 01:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.