Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Bertram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Dan Bertram

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD contested in February with reason “Player is 10 games shy of WP:NHOCKEY criteria #3, including ECHL playoff games. Should make 100 games this year, though player was placed on 21-day IR last week.” Season is now complete and player is still 9 games shy of 100 with no certainty that he will be back to play next season. Player is non-notable and does not pass WP:NHOCKEY. Scottdrink (talk) 20:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: He's 24 years old, already took a year off due to injuries and was a sporadic player in the mid-minors last season, again due to injuries. This is exactly the point where many a player with no hope of making the bigs packs it in.  No prejudice against recreation should he play next season, of course, but no reason to keep this article.   Ravenswing  11:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Ravenswing.  Patken4 (talk) 00:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 09:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per Ravenswing. He doesn't meet requirements anyway. USA1168 (talk) 21:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.