Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Dreifort

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 09:36, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Dan Dreifort
Literal transcription of a review article, very POV and suspected copyvio (even though it says 'used with permission'). Definitely not encyclopedic, if Dan is notable I'd suggest a new article be started from scratch. Radiant! 10:56, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Clearly the author of this drivel has never seen the inside of an encyclopedia: this article doesn't belong in one. Trilobite (Talk) 15:00, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, paste-copied teen-mag wannabe fluff piece, no article here, move along. Wyss 19:35, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV cut-and-paste article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 04:51, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, quickly, before anyone sees this and suggests we start Wikiteenia. BenSamples 21:15, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)