Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Gunn Jr.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Dan Gunn Jr.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

His murder is one of two cases in Houston, County that is unsolved, but that does not show notability per WP:VICTIM. The only news article is from 1984 which is when he was murdered and I can't find anymore. There has been no coverage after the year of his murder. SL93 (talk) 23:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, does not meet WP:VICTIM or WP:BLP1E. --Tgeairn (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - not mentioned much in media doesnt equal non-notability. seems to pass WP:GNG. need more input I think on this AfD.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Most murder victims receive coverage in multiple sources which is why I brought up WP:VICTIM. There is also only one news reference in the article anyway. SL93 (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't see anything that can be done with this article to make it more notable than so many other stalled murder investigations. I don't see anywhere that it might be merged, except maybe a new section in the Houston County, Georgia article. Those who may still be seeking closure to this event perhaps need to get in touch with John Walsh and/or the Attorney General of Georgia, as well as put continuing effort into promoting the Gunn Cold Case website. The article can always be recreated later on down the road if significant, noteworthy developments take place. This article is not covered under WP:BLP1E as death was published by a reliable source (see WP:BDP). I believe is covered under WP:VICTIM "consistant with WP:BLP1E" without differentiating the living from the deceased. Kinda vague I think. It might need a few more words to clarify it better.  Ken Tholke (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.