Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Heder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Jon Heder.  MBisanz  talk 10:41, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Dan Heder

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Relationships do not confer notability. No indication that the rest of his bio would qualify him for inclusion (WP:CREATIVE) without that relationship. Rd232 talk 13:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Merge - into Jon Heder.  Jd 027  (talk) 17:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton  Talk  ·  Review  00:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. I think he has enough notability outside of Jon to stay.  Just barely, but enough. --Grev (talk) 02:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete so he has a notable brother, went to acting classes with a notable actress, and is distantly related to a notable sportscaster; but what has he done? a few bit parts, only one of which in a notable show, and he's been on Letterman. Woo-hoo, so far fails WP:GNG that if this is the measure of notability - most actors in tv commercials, local plays that get reviewed in the local rags, and game-show losers qualify. That isn't the case. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.