Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Hollingsworth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Dan Hollingsworth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Of the articles 11 sources: 6 are election results, one is his voter registration, two are from the town website, One is a private profile, and one is someone else's obtiuary. GPL93 (talk) 19:52, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Ruston LA is not large enough to confer an automatic presumption of notability on its mayors just because they exist, but none of the references here are actually notability-supporting sources. A mayor is not automatically notable enough for a Wikipedia article just because it's possible to verify his vote totals in the elections — the notability test for a mayor hinges on his being the subject of a significant volume of journalism, not just on verifying that he existed as a mayor. Bearcat (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG ~GMC  {talk to me} 19:11, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not pass WP:GNG as the mayor of a small town. --Enos733 (talk) 22:20, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Small town mayors are not inherently notable; not indication taht this one passed GNG for any other accomplishment.E.M.Gregory (talk) 04:59, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.