Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan James Pantone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was cool down, no consensus. I'm pretty sure nobody is going to be particularly happy with having this closed this way, and it's not particularly pleasant to simply reschedule a debate that has apparently already resulted in one editor leaving the project, several accusations of libel, and even possibly an instance of actual libel. So my first suggestion is that everybody involved in this discussion cool down and let some time pass before reopening this debate.

I'm closing this as no consensus based on the oft referenced "professor test" in WP:BIO. While WP:PROF has set a higher bar and includes more rigorous criteria by which to evaluate notability in this case, it is also a proposed guideline at this time. Given the entire nature of the discussion here, I'm not about to base the decision on a proposed guideline. Based on the criteria in WP:BIO the question of notability would seem to be a close call. Too close of a call to make in this heated environment, so the decision is no consensus with the strong recommendation that no further nomination of this article be made for at least a month. —Doug Bell talk 08:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Dan James Pantone
__NOINDEX__


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.