Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Legg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The nominator may be an WP:SPA but the other participants in the discussion are not, the consensus is that the subject is not notable and there is no attempt to refute this. ST47 (talk) 04:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Dan Legg

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Page isn't notable. page is a Self-promotion and publicity(although vandalised) for a person with no notability beyond a few media articles. This individual uses publicity (instagram/yourtube/new paper articles etc) to promote their business, this wikipedia article is just another facet of this. https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/beatthescammers/article-8522169/Beware-bedroom-traders-boasting-fortunes-currency-bets.htmlKeithClark21 (talk) 17:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The company he founded "TeamFX" doesn't even have a wikipedia article. If anything, the company should have an article and be deemed notable before an article on the founder be created (as the company seems to be the only reason the creator thought he was notable). Elijahandskip (talk) 17:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

This Article contains fair content about Dan Legg and I do not believe deletion is the best for Wikipedia readers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:A40F:B200:617C:A795:77AE:5E43 (talk) 20:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: per Elijahandskip's comments, there might be a case for creating a WP article for the company with which he's involved (although I couldn't find many independent, reliable sources that would pass WP:CORPDEPTH), but he simply doesn't pass the criteria at WP:ANYBIO. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * comment/Keep Well after seeing the page history and all it seems he is being targeted with new users and even the nominator is new born and seems to have personal grudge, based on sources the page is passing WPGNG easily. Looks like being vandalised by a group of socks. JK.Kite (talk) 19:58, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.