Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan McCulloch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 10:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Dan McCulloch

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Sources are skim to none, verified He wrote for torchwood but nothing for a BIO Weaponbb7 (talk) 17:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Another Cautious delete, I don't see and can't find any reliable sources to establish this guy's notability either, but there are many people with the same name, obscuring the search for sources. Cazort (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, Added new sources and material to article, Dan McCullogh was nominated for a BAFTA, a British Academy Award, for Best Short Film in 2007, he's also the producer of the hit independent horror film Tony (film), may be enough for notability.98.151.53.27 (talk) 01:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'm changing my recommendation to weak keep; it would be nicer to have some sourceable biographical information. Cazort (talk) 20:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep New material added to article helps with notability.12.196.37.227 (talk) 20:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment Slim on notability. This appears to be the guy. If we keep this, it's on the assumption that McCulloch will do more of interest in the future&mdash;at this time, there is not enough for a useful encyclopedia article. / edg ☺ ☭ 18:44, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.