Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Millice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Dan Millice

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not seem to be notable, in the WP sense, although he seems to be talented and ambitious. Lack of secondary sources which give us information about him. BigJim707 (talk) 04:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see any evidence of notability. Drmies (talk) 04:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Author was given time to provide WP:N sources, yet failed to do so. Only sources are those that are the subject's self published website. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 04:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * OTRS note: Some text from the article was confirmed as free-use licensed per OTRS, . I'm not expressing sentiment regarding notability itself, and will defer to community about that. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete--there's only one reliable source in the article, and it quotes him in passing. As far as I can tell he isn't notable yet, and the article makes no claims that he is. Meelar (talk) 23:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, fails WP:Music. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 06:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.