Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Opp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Ral315 (talk) 04:25, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Dan Opp
Probably vanity, but not 100% sure. --Alan Au 05:40, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete probably vanity, but 3 articles on an ezine is not sufficient notability =P jnothman talk 06:42, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, no assertion of notability. --Angr/undefined 07:22, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Save this one, Dan is actually one of the more popular writers on the website Points in Case, which is among the most well-known to college students. Points in Case is a new entry on Wiki, so there should be additional info about him to follow. Pointsi 13:38, 4 November 2005 (UTC) his user's first edit (contribs) was on November 1, 2005, and almost all his edits have been on articles about "Points in Case" and its staff members. I think they all should be looked at for possible AfD. - Dalbury 21:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete And I'm not sure Points in Case shouldn't be on AfD either. Marcus22 15:48, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. - Dalbury 21:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - nonnotable ERcheck 02:47, 5 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.