Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Patrick Catch Phrases


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 06:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Dan Patrick Catch Phrases

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

Per Articles for deletion/Keith Olbermann catch phrases. I beleive this article is irrelevant. J390 (talk) 03:46, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

By the rules of Articles for Deletion, this page is unencyclopedic trivia that serves no vital purpose. It should be deleted or possibly merged into the Dan Patrick article. J390 (talk) 03:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as trivia. -- Whpq (talk) 15:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete con Fuego per the above. A few of the really good ones ("You can't stop him, you can only hope to contain him") are already mentioned at Dan Patrick, so no worries about coverage. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep con Fuego to steal from Dan and above. He obviously has some notable catch phrases.  He's known for them.  So why would a summation of said phrases not be appropriate for inclusion as either part of or and adjunct to his article?  Same goes for other ESPN characters with notable histories of catch phrases.  I'll be glad to merge it with the article, but that might make the section and article overly voluminous, thus the separate article and wikilink. Trackinfo (talk) 22:23, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know much about Dan Patrick, to tell you the truth. I know we deleted the Keith Olbermann catch phrases article, and it had catchphrases from both his sports and political commentary, so I figured this could be deleted, too, by that logic. Also, articles on people's neologisms generally get deleted here. J390 (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete con Fuego per Ultraexactzz.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.