Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Rogers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Dan Rogers

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Poorly-sourced article about a mayor. As always, mayors do not get an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL just by virtue of existing -- the notability of a mayor hinges on writing and sourcing substantive content about his political impact: specific things he did, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects his leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But this is strictly on the level of "Dan Rogers is a mayor who existed, the end", and is "referenced" solely to his "meet your mayor" profile on the self-published website of the city government, which is a primary source that does not support notability at all. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to hand him an automatic inclusion freebie without WP:GNG-worthy coverage. Bearcat (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero secondary sources, no evidence of meeting notability requirements. AusLondonder (talk) 17:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 02:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.