Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Saenz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  05:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Dan Saenz
I honestly don't know if this guy is a notable producer, but the article looks like junk imported from MySpace, and the author has ignored a suggestion to clean up the article, and is removing cleanup tags. Based on the user name, I think there is a conflict of interest issue. If we should have an article on Saenz, this certainly is not it. Upp◦land 07:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Not really sure where you got that idea that this is junk imported from myspace... If you did a little research or had any sort of background in the music industry you would clearly know that this page is not merely "Junk". The page is completely factual and contains no personal views of any kind. Not really sure what you need to see in order for this to be a relevant article, in which you would not bad mouth because of lack of knowledge in his industry. A little more information would be helpful for people wanting to improve the quality of articles on Wiki. JMGUSA 07:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * If you had read what I wrote at your talkpage several days ago ("If you think the page deserves a chance to stay, you really need to make an effort to make it look and read like a Wikipedia article, and, most importantly, to provide independent [third-party] sources [such as reviews] that demonstrate the significance of the subject.") and acted on it, I might not have made this nomination, but you have elected to ignore it completely. The fact is that the article looks like promotional junk and the only links it has are an "official" website and a MySpace webpage (also "official"). Upp◦land 08:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is NOT myspace. MER-C 08:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The nomination was properly listed but removed from the daily AFD page by the article author. Upp◦land 16:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Remove the irrelevant text about the studio, remove the pics of the studios, remove the logo and remove the Quincey Jones quote.  What's left?  Nothing to justify an article in Wikipedia.  Emeraude 14:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. He's remixed a bunch of stuff, but I don't see that that makes him notable unless they've become hits.  No allmusic entry.  bikeable (talk) 04:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. WMMartin 17:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.