Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Stec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Dan Stec

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable local politician. Has a number of GHits and some GNEWS, but they only mention him in passing or are about his bid for office. Article lacks references to support notability in either WP:BIO or WP:POLITICIAN. Appears to fail WP:POLITICIAN.  ttonyb (talk) 23:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. As near as I can tell from the article on Town supervisor, it's not the equivalent (or superior) of a Mayor and thus cannot automatically meet WP:POLITICIAN; I don't see any significant coverage in widespread sources that would meet WP:GNG.  I note that WP:POLITICIAN says that this should possibly become a redirect to the election in which he's running -- except he doesn't seem to have thrown his hat in the Senatorial ring yet.  No bar to recreation should the situation/coverage change; I mean by this that he wins the seat, not merely decides to run for it.  Accounting4Taste: talk 01:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete nom and Accounting4Taste already summarize well - unnotable, local politition with no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources outside of his local area -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 06:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable beyond the suburbs of Glens Falls, New York. He may be up-and-coming, but he is not yet there. Bearian (talk) 00:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.