Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Steinberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Dan Steinberg

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable WP:JOURNALIST Yousef Raz (talk) 04:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:53, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 16:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NOTWEBHOST. This article has been here for almost 15 years with no WP:SIGCOV appearing in all of that time. As of this writing, it is not even listed under, probably for good reason, so I don't see a point in redirecting. StonyBrook (talk) 01:16, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as not meeting NBIO. Note to closer: this was incorrectly listed at Fictional elements-related deletion discussions; I'll remove it from that list. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is no indication that Steinberg has received enough coverage to support an article. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 00:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.