Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Williamson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Due to the low participation, this is a soft delete, and the article can be undeleted through a request at WP:REFUND. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 12:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Dan Williamson

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:BIO. A Google search for did not appear to produce much more than some short news stories about him becoming sports director at a television station. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:38, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:28, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:28, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:28, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:34, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - Google News and Google News archives found zero relevant sources and he's probably only locally known. Additionally, radio hosts rarely receive news coverage about themselves but rather event appearances or topics that they may have discussed. Exclusions are nationally known personalities such as Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. This radio personality is not notable to Wikipedia standards at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  02:22, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ  21™  03:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.