Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Eskelson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 12:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Dana Eskelson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as insufficiently notable actress; fails GNG. Quis separabit? 06:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lonehexagon (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lonehexagon (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Of note is that the article was significantly expanded on 20:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC) (diff).
 * Speedy delete a biography of a living person lacking any reliable sources at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep She's had many named roles in movies, plays and popular television series. The problem with the article was a lack of any reliable sources to actually verify any facts. I've added several newspaper entries, reviews, listings, etc, which verify some of the roles. I believe she now passes for WP:NACTOR for "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Lonehexagon (talk) 21:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, meets WP:NACTOR, article now reflects this, thanks to . Coolabahapple (talk) 13:13, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NACTOR, only minor roles. GretLomborg (talk) 18:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 15:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:NACTOR. As a single example, Evie in To Sir, with Love II is not a minor role. Ross-c (talk) 21:25, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment, hi, i wonder if you mean "insignificant" rather than "minor" as an actor can have a minor role in a movie/tv show that nevertheless is pivotal to the entire show (cant think of any at the moment, im sure other editors can give us some examples:)), anyhow i will not be presumptious and change your wording ps. my "keep" above is because i believe she has been in a number of significant non-minor roles. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.