Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Karl Glover


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ––FormalDude (talk)  00:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Dana Karl Glover

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NBIO. No reliable sources while Googlin' it up, nothin'. Sarrail (talk) 15:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:28, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music.  Sarrail  (talk) 15:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, as written. BD2412  T 21:44, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Looking at his IMDB page, I saw that he has appeared in 4 interviews and 7 articles, including game magazines such as Computer Gaming World and Power Play, and some newspapers such as Austin American Statesman. I was initially unable to locate all of these sources, but I did find two that may meet WP:GNG - the CGW magazine and an article from the Statesman on the WP Library. In case someone else wants to locate the rest of the sources, use the IMDB link above. Thanks, PantheonRadiance (talk) 02:44, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

*Weak Keep I couldn't locate enough trustworthy sources in my BEFORE research, but after checking at his work, it appears that he is qualified for a Wikipedia article.. Tictictoc (talk) 12:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC) striking confirmed, blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. A wikipedia libary search turns up empty, and as the nom said google also doesn't show anything reliable. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 22:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep based on the two sources given above, I can't find anything extra, but they offer just enough notability. Oaktree b (talk) 04:46, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.