Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Thomas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as the current article is more acceptable (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  19:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Dana Thomas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and improvable journalist article as the best I found was this, this, this and this and therefore I simply see no convincingly better improvement (at best the article could somehow be mustered to a borderline better article but it's still questionable). This article has also stayed the same since started by the subject herself since September 2008. SwisterTwister  talk  06:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. When adding "fashion", to search parameters, was easily able to find hundreds of great results in secondary source coverage, at . &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Passes WP:AUTHOR point #3. The subject has played a major role in creating a well-known work, authoring the book Gods and Kings: The Rise and Fall of Alexander McQueen and John Galliano. Furthermore, the book has received many reviews in reliable sources. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , . North America1000 10:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment – Do you feel that the sources provided above establish notability for the subject? North America1000 13:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.