Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana ste.claire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 12:19, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Dana ste.claire
This was another XD'd page. It was originally vanity by the subject's wife or daughter. I've completely rewritten it as a stub. However, he is so off-the-radar that the source I cite claims 3 books, only lists 2 of which he is the author of only 1 (the editor of the other). Amazon can't find his 3rd work, either. The positions he holds are of strictly local consequence, and all his links are red. Delete fairly normal human being. -Splash talk 22:48, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - I didn't realise that WP:XD was now a real policy. I thought it was still just a theory. Zordrac 23:11, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Umm, it is still only experimental. Unfortunately, the participants have not been cleaning up after their experiments. -Splash talk 23:23, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I just give them a good ol' when they do that. Peyna 00:42, 30 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.