Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance Wiv Me (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (non-admin closure), Song is now number 1 in UK charts is very notable.. Barryob  (Contribs)   (Talk)  23:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Dance Wiv Me
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently non-notable track not yet released as a single. There appear to be few facts of significance, just description. This article has been recreated after previous deletion. No references are listed Tommer312 (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC) --Madchester (talk) 03:25, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   —Tommer312 (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. There is a music video for this track. I think the article needs more sources to assert its notability.
 * Delete It has already been deleted. No sources are listed.--Tommer312 (talk) 13:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It is a notable song - it's been played loads on the music channel and, according to the article at least, it went straight to No 1 on the iTunes download charts. That information needs to be verified, to be fair, but if true, means this song surely is "notable". GillsMan (talk) 08:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * not acording to WP:CHARTS unfortunately.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 11:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge any WP:verified and WP:reliably sourced content to the article on the album this song is from and redirect until such a time as the size of the song's content is too large for the parent article. -- saberwyn 09:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 11:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I can't believe this is still up for deletion. If iTunes selling the song isnt enough then I don't know what is. Do people not listen to the radio, watch tv or even never heard of glastonbury??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackw.ward (talk • contribs) 12:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The song has now been released; it's no 1 in the iTunes download chart; its acoustic performance was included in the best bits from the BBC's Glastonbury coverage; it's not on an album, so it can't be included elsewhere. Sonofulster (talk) 12:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The song is due to be the UK number one single this week, so it should not be deleted as it will just have to be re-made once the song charts this Sunday. It will be notable as it is the rapper's first top 5 single and it is not on an album. TopopMAC1 (talk)
 * Keep Notable song, looks like there are reliable sources out there too. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly notable.-- Barryob  (Contribs)   (Talk)  20:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Google shows many sources that are reliable about the subject. I see little to no reasons to why this is non-notable. Passes notability per WP:MUSIC. -- RyRy  ( talk ) 10:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.