Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancilla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Dancilla

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I found no coverage in multiple searches. This website is non-notable. SL93 (talk) 23:11, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No coverage in reliable third-party sources - fails WP:WEB and WP:GNG. → B  music  ian  01:37, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:28, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * delete. Unfortunately this rather impressive (for those who are interested in folk dance) website failed to become fully notable, even if the efforts are commendable. - Altenmann >t 18:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No WP:RS. There is no rank stated and no hits at gnews or notable-hits at google. Thus this is not WP:N and fails WP:GNG.  →TSU tp* 15:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.