Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing baloney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Dancing baloney
Original research and an attempt to create a neologism, delete --Peta 05:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism... though I don't really understand how they hurt Wikipedia. --Garrepi 05:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems to have quite a few Google hits and is far from a rare term. --- RockMFR 05:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Google hits are from Wikipedia and mirror sites in the main. Neologisms do not hurt Wikipedia, but they have no place here as by definition a neologism is original research. Vizjim 06:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. We (Wikipedians) have incestuously created the term protologism. Further objections are that they are a form of vanity and attempts to change the language while Wikipedia strives to report the world as it is without changing it. -- RHaworth 07:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It was actually Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. See protologism. Uncle G 08:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.