Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing on Ice (series 4) weekly scores


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Dancing on Ice (Series 4).  MBisanz  talk 20:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Dancing on Ice (series 4) weekly scores

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notable enough, delete per this precedent. Philip Stevens (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a DOI fansite. Stifle (talk) 16:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No D_ice (trivial stats) Ddawkins73 (talk) 17:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete totally non-notable - who actually cares?. Dreamspy (talk) 17:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sure how this fits in, and this appears to be more tracking of scores than anything.  Better off on a personal web page someplace. - Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very, very trivial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmies (talk • contribs)
 * Merge but this is not trivial, so the information must be relocated here if it is deleted, which it looks like it will be. Sky83 (talk) 19:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment, I think this is a good idea. --Philip Stevens (talk) 19:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge anything not in Dancing on Ice (Series 4) over there, which I don't think is much. Hate to use an essay since it's not grounded in policy, but I cite the Pokemon test of comparing very similar articles that have already been deleted (also makes sense). MuZemike 19:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment--doesn't the main article, Dancing on Ice (Series 4), cover this information already? I mean, the only thing that this article adds, if I see it correctly, are the "judges' votes to save." Is that really so relevant? Drmies (talk) 21:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No, there is a more detailed breakdown of the scores, which is why the info should be relocated. If this was simply deleted, a lot of information would be lost. Which is why I have changed my vote to Merge. Sky83 (talk) 11:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  01:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.