Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing puppets trick (relist nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Dancing puppets trick

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Previous AFD (Articles for deletion/Dancing puppets trick) closed on 8 March 2007 with No consensus; renom in two weeks if no WP:RS added. It's been over a month, and no-one has added any. Tearlach 01:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of sources. YechielMan 03:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; This should have been deleted first time around. But delete this time as no sources added after previous nomination (as well as the OR problems stated in previous AfD.) Crazysuit 03:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Stong delete. Fails WP:ATT and WP:V, which are core policies. Also fails WP:RS. No sources have been added because the authors of this article have obviously written it based on their own observations, so there are no sources for this material. Pufnstuf 04:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The article has had more than two weeks to cite (it's been over a month now since the first AfD), and nothing has been cited. However, I will change my tune if citations are added in the next five days while this AfD is still open. Rock star  ( T/C ) 05:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Very thoughrough (London, July 1986 (Covent Garden)), but we hardly need to know where a trickster was selling paper puppets over 20 years ago - basically this is NN, non encyclopedic & has no sources. May be suited for WikiTravel, or being merged into a related article on Wikipedia (If sources can ever be found... which I doubt). Also has hints of OR. So that's one delete from me. Spawn Man 05:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I provided the only ghost of a citation at the last AFD and nothing else, apparently, has turned up. Lack of being noted equals lack of notability. --Dhartung | Talk 05:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of sources. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 12:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as sources seem to be impossible to find, will change to keep in the unlikely event of the article being reasonably sourced.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 14:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Should have been deleted the first time around, but the authors were given a second chance with it and nothing has been since done to address the concerns.  Still no sources, still nothing to verify this.  Ar ky an  &#149; (talk) 15:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete A very POV and unencyclopedic essay which fails WP:ATT and WP:N due to a lack of references. It reads like one person's grievance against a street vendor because they could not get the gimmick they bought to work at home. Edison 20:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.